JPMiginiac.com

Aller au contenu | Aller au menu | Aller à la recherche

mardi 29 avril 2008

Repères 29/04/08 - Torture : George W. Bush s'affranchit une nouvelle fois du droit international

Repères 29/04/08 - Torture : George W. Bush s'affranchit une nouvelle fois du droit international

Lutte antiterroriste : les agents de la CIA seraient autorisés à contourner le droit international
LEMONDE.FR avec AFP et Reuters 27.04.08

"L'administration Bush a affirmé au Congrès que les agents du renseignement américain pouvaient, pour lutter contre le terrorisme, avoir recours à des méthodes d'interrogatoires interdites par le droit international..."

 

Administration Says Particulars May Trump Geneva Protections
Washington Post Sunday, April 27, 2008

"The Geneva Conventions' ban on "outrages against personal dignity" does not automatically apply to terrorism suspects in the custody of U.S. intelligence agencies, the Justice Department has suggested to Congress in recent letters that lay out the Bush administration's interpretation of the international treaty.

Lawyers for the department, offering insight into the legal basis for the CIA's controversial interrogation program, reasserted in the letters the Bush administration's long-held view that it has considerable leeway in deciding how the conventions' rules apply to the harsh questioning of combatants in the war on terrorism.

While the United States is legally bound by the conventions' Common Article 3 and its requirement to treat detainees humanely, the definition of humane treatment can vary, depending on the detainee's identity and the importance of the information he possesses, a Justice Department official wrote last September and this March to a Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee..."

 

Letters Give C.I.A. Tactics a Legal Rationale
New York Times 27/04/08

"The Justice Department has told Congress that American intelligence operatives attempting to thwart terrorist attacks can legally use interrogation methods that might otherwise be prohibited under international law..."

 

lundi 10 mars 2008

La phrase du jour 10/03/08 - Human Rights Watch

La phrase du jour 10/03/08 - Human Rights Watch

"Le président Bush restera dans l'histoire comme le président de la torture"

Jennifer Daskal, responsable du dossier du contre-terrorisme d'Human Rights Watch

 

Le président Bush refuse d'interdire la torture du "waterboarding"
LEMONDE.FR | 10.03.08

"Le président George Bush l'avait annoncé, il l'a fait : vendredi 7 mars, il a opposé son veto à une loi adoptée par le Congrès américain à la fin du mois de février, interdisant l'usage des méthodes "poussées" d'interrogatoires des "combattants ennemis illégaux", nom donné aux personnes soupçonnées d'appartenir à Al-Qaida. La principale méthode visée est le waterboarding, un simulacre de noyade basé sur la torture dite de "la baignoire". Après la Chambre des représentants, le Sénat avait voté l'interdiction de ces méthodes par 51 voix contre 45...

...Le directeur de l'Union américaine des libertés civiques, Anthony Romero, a estimé que les Etats-Unis "continueront, malgré le vote du Congrès, à se conduire de manière inhumaine et atroce". "Le président Bush restera dans l'histoire comme le président de la torture", a conclu la responsable du dossier du contre-terrorisme d'Human Rights Watch, Jennifer Daskal. Même réaction du sénateur démocrate Ted Kennedy, pour qui il s'agit "d'un des actes les plus honteux" de la présidence de George Bush. Candidat républicain à l'élection présidentielle, John McCain a, quant à lui, toujours manifesté son opposition à l'usage de la torture.

"Devant la persistance des dangers, nous devons assurer aux responsables de nos services de renseignement qu'ils disposent de tous les moyens nécessaires" pour mener la lutte contre "les terroristes", a dit le président pour justifier so veto lors d'une allocution. Il a reproché au texte de loi voté par le Congrès son inefficacité : il "n'interdit aucune méthode d'interrogatoire" tout en empêchant l'usage des "procédures alternatives mises en œuvre pour interroger les terroristes les plus violents au monde", a-t-il expliqué..."

 

Voir aussi :

European Court of Human Rights Reaffirms the Absolute Prohibition on Return to Torture
HRW 28/02/08

"(Strasbourg, February 28, 2008) – The European Court of Human Rights today reaffirmed that the ban on deporting people to countries where they are at risk of torture or ill-treatment is absolute and unconditional..."

 

mardi 15 janvier 2008

Repères 15/01/08 - Bagram, l'autre Guantanamo

Repères 15/01/08 - Bagram, l'autre Guantanamo

Un rapport confidentiel de la Croix Rouge le révèle, la base militaire US de Bagram, en Afghanistan, récèle un centre de détention peut-être encore pire que Guantanamo.

Afghan Prison Looks Like Another Guantanamo
IPS Jan 14

"It is a prison located on the U.S. military base at base in the ancient city of Bagram near Charikar in Parvan, Afghanistan. The detention centre was set up by the U.S. military as a temporary screening site after the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan overthrew the Taliban. It currently houses some 630 prisoners -- close to three times as many as are still held at Guantanamo.

In 2005, following well-documented accounts of detainee deaths, torture, and "disappeared" prisoners, the U.S. undertook efforts to turn the facility over to the Afghan government. But thanks to a series of legal, bureaucratic and administrative missteps, the prison is still under U.S. military control. And a recent confidential report from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has reportedly complained about the continued mistreatment of prisoners.

The ICRC report is said to cite massive overcrowding, "harsh" conditions, lack of clarity about the legal basis for detention, prisoners held "incommunicado", in "a previously undisclosed warren of isolation cells," and "sometimes subjected to cruel treatment in violation of the Geneva Conventions." Some prisoners have been held without charges or lawyers for more than five years.

According to Hina Shamsi of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), "Bagram appears to be just as bad, if not worse, than Guantanamo. When a prisoner is in American custody and under American control, our values are at stake and our commitment to the rule of law is tested."

She told IPS, "The abuses cited by the Red Cross give us cause for concern that we may be failing the test. The George W. Bush administration is not content to limit its regime of illegal detention to Guantanamo, and has tried to foist it on Afghanistan."..."

 

vendredi 21 décembre 2007

Repères 21/12/07 - Les prisons secrètes de Pervez Musharraf

Repères 21/12/07 - Les prisons secrètes de Pervez Musharraf

Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies, apparently trying to avoid acknowledging an elaborate secret detention system, have quietly set free nearly 100 men suspected of links to terrorism, few of whom were charged, human rights groups and lawyers here say.

Those released, they say, are some of the nearly 500 Pakistanis presumed to have disappeared into the hands of the Pakistani intelligence agencies cooperating with Washington’s fight against terrorism since 2001...

...Interviews with lawyers and human rights officials here, a review of cases by The New York Times and court records made available by the lawyers show how scraps of information have accumulated over recent months into a body of evidence of the detention system...

...In addition, human rights groups and lawyers here contend, the government has swept up at least 4,000 other Pakistanis, most of them Baluchi and Sindhi nationalists seeking ethnic or regional autonomy who have nothing to do with the United States campaign against terrorism...


Picture of Secret Detentions Emerges in Pakistan
The New York Times December 19, 2007

 

- page 1 de 5