JPMiginiac.com

Aller au contenu | Aller au menu | Aller à la recherche

Tag - Politique étrangère

Fil des billets - Fil des commentaires

dimanche 22 février 2009

Les phrases du jour 22/02/09 - Dominique de Villepin

Les phrases du jour 22/02/09 - Dominique de Villepin

"Ce serait une faute que de revenir pleinement dans l'OTAN... Ce n'est pas un détail... C'est véritablement la France qui passe sous les fourches caudines d'un autre pays"

"Nous sommes dans un monde qui est en permanence en risque de confrontation, de bloc à bloc. Aujourd'hui, vouloir pleinement afficher notre appartenance à ce bloc occidental, à un moment où, nous le voyons bien, l'Occident n'est plus seul sur la scène, loin de là, et où les pays du sud s'affirment, c'est une erreur en termes d'image et de stratégie"

"Tendre vers l'est, aller vers le sud, en permanence trouver des solutions que d'autres ne trouvent pas... C'est la vocation de la France. Cette vocation diplomatique, nous devons l'affirmer"

 

Dominique de Villepin à Dimanche+, sur Canal +, le 22/02/09

 

jeudi 13 mars 2008

Repères 13/03/08 - Quand le pentagone décide de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis

Repères 13/03/08 - Quand le pentagone décide de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis

Pentagon Crowds out State on Diplomacy, Eroding Oversight, Report Says
Washington Office on Latin America

"In a little-noticed but disturbing transformation, U.S. foreign policy decision-making is moving from the State Department to the Defense Department.

A report released today shows that this shift of authority is on the verge of becoming permanent as the Department of State and Congress sit passively on the sidelines.

The report, entitled “Ready, Aim, Foreign Policy ”, is a publication of the Just the Facts Project, a ten-year collaboration on security issues between the Washington Office on Latin America, the Center for International Policy, and the Latin America Working Group Education Fund. The report was released as the Senate held hearings on the Southern Command’s annual report to Congress on Thursday, March 6.

The shift toward Pentagon control over large areas of foreign assistance “will have a crucial bearing on how U.S. power is exercised and projected around the world,” says the new report.  

The trend will “diminish congressional, public and even diplomatic control over a substantial lever and symbol of foreign policy.  It will undercut human rights values in our relations with the rest of the world, and increase the trend toward a projection of U.S. global power based primarily on military might,” adds the report.

Recent developments reflecting this shift in responsibilities from State to Defense include:

- The Pentagon’s attempt to expand authority for a pilot foreign military aid program into a permanent and global Defense Department fund.

- The State Department’s call for a restructuring of foreign aid that would cede its management of military aid to the Defense Department and reduce congressional oversight.

- Southcom’s implementation of its “Command Strategy 2016,” which would allow it to coordinate U.S. agencies, including non-military ones, operating in Latin America.

There is a general belief that the State Department process by which foreign military aid and training is provided is cumbersome and inefficient. The report’s authors argue that is not reason enough to turn authority over to the Pentagon.

“It is not acceptable to say ‘State is broken,’ and shift responsibilities to the Defense Department; if State is broken, fix it,” said Joy Olson, Executive Director of the Washington Office on Latin America.

"Military aid is one of the riskiest tools in the U.S. foreign policy toolbox. It requires careful diplomatic management and close congressional oversight,” said Adam Isacson, Program Director at the Center for International Policy. “Moving aid into the Defense budget is weakening a 45-year-old legal framework that sought to guarantee both of those."

The report’s authors stress that the drift toward Pentagon authority over assistance could quickly undermine key human-rights safeguards in U.S. foreign policy, as almost all human rights conditions on foreign assistance are limited to programs funded through State.

“If the Pentagon takes charge of all military aid decisions, we’ll lose the few human rights tools at our disposal.  U.S. aid and training will become even more an entitlement program for the world’s militaries,” said Lisa Haugaard, Director of the Latin America Working Group Education Fund."

 

Full Report : “Ready, Aim, Foreign Policy”

 

lundi 10 mars 2008

Repères 10/03/08 - Ce qu'ils en disent : Le projet d'Union pour la Méditerranée

Repères 10/03/08 - Ce qu'ils en disent : Le projet d'Union pour la Méditerranée

Making sense of Sarkozy’s Union for the Mediterranean
Michael Emerson, The Centre for European Policy Studies 7 March 2008 

"President Sarkozy’s proposed Union for the Mediterranean (or UMed) has so far been poorly conceived and, to say the least, awkwardly presented politically. However this does not mean that nothing good can come of it. The Barcelona process and its confusing combination with the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) have been neither a disaster nor a brilliant success. There is a case for streamlining a single European Mediterranean policy, rationalising and properly integrating Barcelona, the ENP and some new elements of the regional initiative that France is proposing..."