JPMiginiac.com

Aller au contenu | Aller au menu | Aller à la recherche

jeudi 13 mars 2008

Repères 13/03/08 - Quand le pentagone décide de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis

Repères 13/03/08 - Quand le pentagone décide de la politique étrangère des Etats-Unis

Pentagon Crowds out State on Diplomacy, Eroding Oversight, Report Says
Washington Office on Latin America

"In a little-noticed but disturbing transformation, U.S. foreign policy decision-making is moving from the State Department to the Defense Department.

A report released today shows that this shift of authority is on the verge of becoming permanent as the Department of State and Congress sit passively on the sidelines.

The report, entitled “Ready, Aim, Foreign Policy ”, is a publication of the Just the Facts Project, a ten-year collaboration on security issues between the Washington Office on Latin America, the Center for International Policy, and the Latin America Working Group Education Fund. The report was released as the Senate held hearings on the Southern Command’s annual report to Congress on Thursday, March 6.

The shift toward Pentagon control over large areas of foreign assistance “will have a crucial bearing on how U.S. power is exercised and projected around the world,” says the new report.  

The trend will “diminish congressional, public and even diplomatic control over a substantial lever and symbol of foreign policy.  It will undercut human rights values in our relations with the rest of the world, and increase the trend toward a projection of U.S. global power based primarily on military might,” adds the report.

Recent developments reflecting this shift in responsibilities from State to Defense include:

- The Pentagon’s attempt to expand authority for a pilot foreign military aid program into a permanent and global Defense Department fund.

- The State Department’s call for a restructuring of foreign aid that would cede its management of military aid to the Defense Department and reduce congressional oversight.

- Southcom’s implementation of its “Command Strategy 2016,” which would allow it to coordinate U.S. agencies, including non-military ones, operating in Latin America.

There is a general belief that the State Department process by which foreign military aid and training is provided is cumbersome and inefficient. The report’s authors argue that is not reason enough to turn authority over to the Pentagon.

“It is not acceptable to say ‘State is broken,’ and shift responsibilities to the Defense Department; if State is broken, fix it,” said Joy Olson, Executive Director of the Washington Office on Latin America.

"Military aid is one of the riskiest tools in the U.S. foreign policy toolbox. It requires careful diplomatic management and close congressional oversight,” said Adam Isacson, Program Director at the Center for International Policy. “Moving aid into the Defense budget is weakening a 45-year-old legal framework that sought to guarantee both of those."

The report’s authors stress that the drift toward Pentagon authority over assistance could quickly undermine key human-rights safeguards in U.S. foreign policy, as almost all human rights conditions on foreign assistance are limited to programs funded through State.

“If the Pentagon takes charge of all military aid decisions, we’ll lose the few human rights tools at our disposal.  U.S. aid and training will become even more an entitlement program for the world’s militaries,” said Lisa Haugaard, Director of the Latin America Working Group Education Fund."

 

Full Report : “Ready, Aim, Foreign Policy”

 

mardi 4 mars 2008

Repères 04/03/08 - L'armée chinoise vue par le Pentagone

Repères 04/03/08 - L'armée chinoise vue par le Pentagone

2008 China Military Power Report

News Conference Transcript


China Military Expansion Could Have Global Implications
American Forces Press Service March 3, 2008

"China not only is a rising international economic power, but also is a rising military power with new and developing capabilities that have global implications, according to the 2008 China Military Power Report released today.

The annual report mandated by Congress analyzes China’s military development and strategy and says that the country spent as much as $139 billion, more than three times its announced defense budget, modernizing its military forces last year.

That amount dwarfs the military budgets of Russia, Japan and South Korea, and has been the driving force behind the country’s military transformation, fueled by the acquisition of advanced foreign weapons and far-reaching organizational and doctrinal reforms.

Combined with what Defense Department officials call a lack of transparency, the military development poses risks to stability by increasing the potential for misunderstanding and miscalculation, the report concludes.

“China’s military buildup has been characterized by opacity, but (there is an) inability by both people in the region and people around the world to really know what ties together the capabilities that China’s acquiring with the intentions it has,” said David Sedney, deputy assistant secretary of defense for East Asia. “So there are a lot of areas where there is misunderstanding. There are a lot of areas where there is lack of knowledge.”..."

 

lundi 3 mars 2008

Repères 03/03/08 - D'importants généraux démissionneront si George W. Bush donne l'ordre d'attaquer l'Iran

Repères 03/03/08 - D'importants généraux démissionneront si George W. Bush donne l'ordre d'attaquer l'Iran

US generals ‘will quit’ if Bush orders Iran attack
The Sunday Times February 25, 2007

"SOME of America’s most senior military commanders are prepared to resign if the White House orders a military strike against Iran, according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources.

Tension in the Gulf region has raised fears that an attack on Iran is becoming increasingly likely before President George Bush leaves office. The Sunday Times has learnt that up to five generals and admirals are willing to resign rather than approve what they consider would be a reckless attack.

“There are four or five generals and admirals we know of who would resign if Bush ordered an attack on Iran,” a source with close ties to British intelligence said. “There is simply no stomach for it in the Pentagon, and a lot of people question whether such an attack would be effective or even possible.”

A British defence source confirmed that there were deep misgivings inside the Pentagon about a military strike. “All the generals are perfectly clear that they don’t have the military capacity to take Iran on in any meaningful fashion. Nobody wants to do it and it would be a matter of conscience for them..."

 

mercredi 20 février 2008

Repères 20/02/08 - L'état de l'armée américaine

Repères 20/02/08 - L'état de l'armée américaine

The U.S. Military Index
Foreign Policy March/April 2008

"In an exclusive new index, Foreign Policy and the Center for a New American Security surveyed more than 3,400 active and retired officers at the highest levels of command about the state of the U.S. military. They see a force stretched dangerously thin and a country ill-prepared for the next fight..."

 

               

 

- page 1 de 2