JPMiginiac.com

Aller au contenu | Aller au menu | Aller à la recherche

vendredi 21 décembre 2007

Repères 21/12/07 - La fortune de Vladimir Poutine ?

Repères 21/12/07 - La fortune de Vladimir Poutine ?

"...The claims over the president's assets surfaced last month when the Russian political expert Stanislav Belkovsky gave an interview to the German newspaper Die Welt. They have since been repeated in the Washington Post and the Moscow Times, with speculation over the fortune appearing on the internet.

Citing sources inside the president's administration, Belkovsky claims that after eight years in power Putin has secretly accumulated more than $40bn (£20bn). The sum would make him Russia's - and Europe's - richest man..."

Putin, the Kremlin power struggle and the $40bn fortune
The Guardian December 21, 2007

Vladimir Poutine serait l'homme le plus riche d'Europe
Le Monde 21/12/07

 

"...A year ago, a famous Russian journalist asked me: "Is it true that Putin has a net fortune of $35 to 40 billion?" (This journalist, of course, has long been excluded from Kremlin-controlled media.)..."

Russia's New Oligarchy
Washington Post  December 12, 2007

 

"...In a sensational interview in Germany's Die Welt on Nov. 12, Stanislav Belkovsky, the well-connected insider who initiated the Kremlin campaign against Yukos in 2003, made specific claims about Putin's wealth. He alleged that Putin owned 37 percent of Surgutneftegaz (worth $18 billion), 4.5 percent of Gazprom ($13 billion) and half of Timchenko's company, Gunvor (possibly $10 billion). If this information is true, Putin's total personal fortune would amount to no less than $41 billion, placing him among the 10 richest in the world.

These shareholdings have been rumored for years, but now a prominent international newspaper has published such allegations made by a well-informed source. If these numbers contain any truth, Putin would be the most corrupt political leader in world history, easily surpassing Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines and Zaire's Mobutu..."

Unmasking President Putin's Grandiose Myth
The Moscow Times November 28, 2007

"Man sollte die aktive Rolle Putins nicht überschätzen"
Die Welt 12. November 2007

 

mercredi 7 février 2007

Repères 07/02/07 - Criminals and Scoundrels: The 25 Most Corrupt Bush Administration Officials

Repères 07/02/07 - Criminals and Scoundrels: The 25 Most Corrupt Bush Administration Officials

Criminals and Scoundrels: The 25 Most Corrupt Bush Administration Officials
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) February 7, 2007

"Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) released a new report on the most corrupt officials in the Bush administration entitled "Criminals and Scoundrels: The 25 Most Corrupt Bush Administration Officials." For the first time, the report chronicles the criminal activities and misconduct of high level officials in the current administration. Using public and court records, CREW developed a comprehensive list of government officials who have abused the public trust.

CREW found and documented more than more than 160 cases of misconduct over the last six years and then narrowed the list based on type of offense, the official's level of responsibility and the impact on the public trust. The majority of the officials in the report have been convicted of crimes, are currently under criminal investigation, or are being investigated by the inspector generals of their respective agencies. CREW's website, www.citizensforethics.org, provides summaries of each case as well as accompanying exhibits..."


The Report

 

dimanche 17 décembre 2006

Repères 17/12/06 - Yamamah : Cachez cette corruption au nom de l'intérêt national !

Repères 17/12/06 - Yamamah : Cachez cette corruption au nom de l'intérêt national !

'National interest' halts arms corruption inquiry
Guardian 15/12/06

"A major criminal investigation into alleged corruption by the arms company BAE Systems and its executives was stopped in its tracks yesterday when the prime minister claimed it would endanger Britain's security if the inquiry was allowed to continue..."

The arms deal they called the dove: how Britain grasped the biggest prize
Guardian 15/12/06

"The deal of the century, as it came to be known, took three years to complete. But when it was finally signed by Prince Sultan, the Saudi defence minister, on the Caribbean island of Bermuda in 1988 it provided British Aerospace with a stream of revenue worth around $2bn (£1.02bn) a year, with a current total that stands at more than $40bn..."


Saudi 'slush fund' investigation discontinued
Times 14/12/06

"A two-year corruption investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) into a £60 million "slush fund" that was allegedly set up for members of Saudi Arabia's royal family was discontinued today..."


Up in arms
Guardian 29/11/06

"It is unusual for the Guardian to be attacked as too supportive of law and order. But in the last few days, Mike Turner, chief executive of Britain's biggest arms company, BAE Systems, has led a chorus of claims that the nation's economy is imperilled by this newspaper's support for the police..."


BAE secret millions linked to arms broker
Guardian 29/11/06

"Secret payments of millions of pounds from Britain's biggest arms company have been found in Swiss accounts linked to Wafic Said, a billionaire arms broker for the Saudi Royal family, according to legal sources..."


Lire également, Read also :

A dangerous precedent for corporate corruption
FT 17/12/06

"...A necessary, but not sufficient condition for an anti-corruption climate is the right system of legal incentives. In Germany, bribes to foreign officials were tax deductible until 1999. In other words, corruption was not only condoned, but officially encouraged. This is no longer the case.

The UK seems to be moving in the opposite direction. The statement by Lord Goldsmith, the UK’s attorney-general, that “the wider public interest...outweighed the need to maintain the rule of law” in the case of BAE Systems may set a dangerous precedent. If bribery can occasionally be in the national interest, then it cannot be morally wrong in principle. It is a relative crime, depending on who does the bribing and who gets bribed..."


Arms and the man
Guardian 15/12/06

"For a prime minister who once taunted his predecessor as someone "knee deep in dishonour" over an arms deal and who promised that he would be "purer than pure" in office, yesterday was a shabby, shaming day, among the most inglorious he has spent in office. First Tony Blair was interviewed by Scotland Yard at Downing Street, which in itself was an extraordinary thing. Nothing like it has ever happened before. Then, in the House of Lords, the attorney general hauled up the flag of surrender in the face of Saudi demands that the Serious Fraud Office stop its investigation into BAE Systems' arms deals with Saudi Arabia, amid fears for its vast contract to sell Typhoon fighters..."


Blair questioned by police on day of 'burying bad news'
Independant 15/12/06


 

samedi 2 décembre 2006

Repères 02/12/06 - L'Etat irakien miné par la corruption

Repères 02/12/06 - L'Etat irakien miné par la corruption

Corruption: the 'second insurgency' costing $4bn a year
Guardian 02/12/06

"One third of rebuilding contracts under criminal investigation

The Iraqi government is in danger of being brought down by the wholesale smuggling of the nation's oil and other forms of corruption that together represent a "second insurgency", according to a senior US official. Stuart Bowen, who has been in charge of auditing Iraq's faltering reconstruction since 2004, said corruption had reached such levels that it threatened the survival of the state..."

"...A potentially far more serious problem has been the way the US government decided to give out reconstruction contracts. It split the economy into sectors and shared them out among nine big US corporations. In most cases the contracts were distributed without competition and on a cost-plus basis. In other words the contractors were guaranteed a profit margin calculated as a percentage of their costs, so the higher the costs, the higher the profits. In the rush to get work started the contracts were signed early in 2004. In many cases work did not get under way until the year was nearly over. In the months between, the contractors racked up huge bills on wages, hotel bills and restaurants.

According to a Sigir review published in October, Kellogg, Brown and Root (a subsidiary of Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney's former company) was awarded an oil industry repair contract in February 2004 but "direct project activity" did not begin until November 19. In that time KBR's overhead costs were nearly $53m. In fact more than half the company's $300m project costs from 2004-06 went on overheads, the audit found.

Iraq also represented a grey zone beyond the reach of the US civil courts. KBR was found to have overcharged the US military about $60m for fuel deliveries, but that did not stop it winning more government contracts.

A California company, Parsons, had its contract terminated this year after it was found to have finished only six of more than 140 primary healthcare centres it was supposed to build, after two years work and $500m spent. However, the contract was ended "for convenience", meaning Parsons was paid in full. In a police college Parsons built for $75m in Baghdad the plumbing was so bad that urine and excrement rained down from the toilets on to the police cadets. Parsons left a sub-contractor to do repairs but in general there is little punitive action that can be taken for shoddy work..."


Lire, Read :

Arms transport probe zeros in on Pennsylvania store
A sporting goods outlet is suspected of making illegal sales linked to Russian businessman Victor Bout...
LATimes 24/11/06

Blacklisted Russian Tied to Iraq Deals
The Alleged Arms Broker is Behind Four Air Cargo Firms Used by U.S. Contractors, Officials Say
LATimes 14/11/06

 

page 2 de 2 -